Search
Loading...
Get Certified Join the Community
Join the community for Tokenomicon + FinOps X Amsterdam, Sept 23
Join the livestream
Framework
Make Suggestion
This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0 - Read how use or adaptation requires attribution

Automation, Tools, & Services

Framework / Domains / Manage the FinOps Practice / Automation, Tools, & Services

On this page

Developing criteria and methodologies to effectively evaluate and integrate software tools, automation solutions, and professional services aligned with the FinOps Framework Capabilities, and operationalized within FinOps Scopes to help advance the FinOps practice.

Develop a Strategy

  • Inventory and assess current automation practices, FinOps software tools, and FinOps professional services engagements in use
  • Using organizational objectives, identify outcomes that are of highest priority. Map automation solutions, FinOps tools, and professional services activities to FinOps Framework Capabilities to identify gaps and opportunities for improvement to achieve the desired outcomes
  • Establish organizational policies and governance criteria that apply to the evaluation, selection, and use of FinOps tools, including criteria for when professional services engagements are warranted and when automation solutions are appropriate
  • Define a collection of use cases for when to  “build”, “buy”, and/or “automate”  that guides decisions about developing internal solutions, procuring commercial tools, or engaging professional services

Evaluation and Selection

  • Define and maintain selection criteria ensuring alignment with the FinOps Framework Capabilities and organization priorities when selecting FinOps tools, and evaluating professional services offerings.
  • Evaluate opportunities for automation solutions against organizational requirements, considering factors such as functionality, integration complexity, cost, scalability, and sustainability
  • Assess the relative merits of native technology provider tooling versus third-party commercial solutions versus internally developed automation, and document recommendations with supporting rationale

Implement and Operationalize

  • Configure, integrate, and onboard stakeholder Personas for the selected FinOps tools in alignment with organizational policies
  • Provide training, enablement, and ongoing support to ensure all stakeholder Personas can effectively leverage automation solutions and FinOps tools within their area of responsibility
  • Deploy automation solutions and FinOps tools prioritized by organizational unit and FinOps Scope, measuring adoption and impact over time to inform continuous improvement
  • Manage professional services engagements by establishing clear scope, deliverables, and success criteria at the outset, tracking progress and outcomes against organizational objectives, and capturing and socializing knowledge and artifacts generated through the engagement to ensure lasting value beyond the conclusion of the engagement itself

Definition

The landscape of automation solutions, tools, and professional services available to support organizations with their FinOps practice is diverse and growing. Software vendors offer a wide array of FinOps tools, and many organizations also build their own solutions using inputs like FOCUS-formatted datasets integrated into internal systems. The increasing availability of automation solutions, from native technology provider tooling to third-party platforms and internally developed solutions, means that organizations have more options than ever to operationalize their FinOps practice activities across FinOps Scopes and technology categories.

For purposes of describing this Capability, a FinOps Tool refers to software with features or functionality that enables one or more FinOps Framework Capabilities for FinOps Personas. Tools range from broad FinOps platforms that support most Capabilities, to specialty tools that target and deeply support a specific FinOps Capability. A FinOps Automation Solution refers to the use of scripting, workflows, APIs, or other programmatic approaches to automate repeatable FinOps activities, reducing manual effort, improving consistency, and enabling the FinOps practice to scale across the organization. A FinOps Professional Service refers to a third-party engagement to deliver outcomes related to FinOps Capabilities, including training, consultancy, managed services, or the outsourcing of specific parts of the FinOps practice.

This Capability is about how an organization reviews its requirements for implementing automation solutions, selecting FinOps tools, engaging with professional services, and adopts them to further its FinOps maturity and practice. Strategies should be developed that take into consideration the organization’s priorities and desired outcomes, the policies that will govern the use of tools, automation, and professional services, what is currently in use or available, strategic vendor relationships, the technology categories the organization is operating across, and the organization’s appetite to build, integrate, or adopt new tooling and automation solutions. Understanding these factors before evaluating specific solutions or service offerings ensures that time and effort is not wasted considering options that cannot be used, conflict with existing investments, or are misaligned with organizational strategy.

The Automation, Tools & Services strategy and the corresponding selection criteria will evolve over time as the organization’s needs change and its FinOps Maturity level advances. FinOps practitioners should regularly reevaluate the automation solutions deployed, FinOps tools in use, and professional services activities usage to ensure alignment with technology usage and organizational priorities. Every organization will use some combination of native technology provider tooling, third-party or open source solutions, internally developed tools and automation, and professional services to support the execution of their FinOps strategy. The mix of automation, tooling, and professional services will evolve as the organization’s FinOps maturity level advances and the value generated by the practice grows.

When considering tools and automation solutions, organizations should be mindful of interoperability and open standards as key criteria. Used well, automation solutions and FinOps tools can eliminate or streamline routine tasks, improve data quality, and enable the FinOps practice to scale. Ensuring that FinOps Personas have access to the information and solutions they need, in a format that supports their specific responsibilities, remains an important and ongoing challenge. The effort required to onboard, integrate, and truly understand the data and workflows managed by FinOps tools should not be underestimated, including considerations like who will have access, how systems will be used, and which parts of the organization will adopt solutions first, are essential to realizing the full value of the investment.

When considering professional services engagements, whether consultancy, managed services, or outsourced operations, organizations should be mindful they can accelerate value creation in specific areas of the FinOps practice. However, over-reliance on professional services can create organizational dependency and limit the development of internal FinOps practice maturity. Balancing the use of professional services with FinOps Education & Enablement of the organization’s own FinOps Personas is essential to building a sustainable and self-sufficient practice. Ultimately, a successful FinOps practice is one that consistently delivers value by supporting the outcomes and objectives of the organization itself.

Shift-Left FinOps is often enabled through work performed in the Automation, Tools & Services Capability. Within this Capability, Shifting Left means the tooling surfaces a cost signal or blocks an action before the cost is incurred, not after. At Crawl, this looks like a manually triggered script that flags an obviously oversized resource. Walk wires cost checks into CI/CD, so a pull request shows the cost delta automatically. Run adds live enforcement: throttles, fallback paths, and scheduled shutdown rules that act at the moment of consumption.

View the FinOps Landscape to learn more about FinOps tools and service providers.

Maturity Assessment

Crawl

  • Little to no formal requirements gathering process exists for evaluating and selecting FinOps tools, or professional services, with decisions often made reactively or based on limited information
  • Criteria for automation solutions are loosely defined or absent, making it difficult to objectively evaluate options or measure success post-implementation
  • Little to no market research is performed prior to tools selection, with limited awareness of the full range of FinOps tools available to support the FinOps practice’s needs across all FinOps Scopes
  • Few FinOps Personas are involved in requirements gathering or vendor selection, resulting in solutions that may not adequately address the needs of all relevant stakeholders across the organization
  • No build/buy/automate analysis is performed, with little consideration given to the relative merits of native technology provider tooling, third-party commercial solutions, or internally developed automation
  • Little to no implementation planning exists, with limited thought given to how automation solutions and tools will be integrated into existing FinOps processes, workflows, and organizational structures
  • Little to no training or enablement is provided to FinOps Personas who will use the selected tools or automation solutions, limiting adoption and the realization of value from investments made
  • No continuous evaluation of automation solutions, FinOps tools, or professional services activities against organizational requirements, resulting in solutions that may become misaligned with evolving needs over time
  • A manually run script or dashboard flags obvious waste after the fact

Walk

  • A well-defined requirements gathering process is established for FinOps Practitioners, Finance, and Engineering Personas, capturing their needs and priorities for what activities should be automated, what features and functionality are needed from FinOps tools, and criteria for professional services activities in a consistent and repeatable way
  • Basic requirements gathering is extended to other stakeholder Personas, ensuring that a broader range of organizational needs and constraints are represented in selection and evaluation decisions
  • A reasonable level of market research is performed prior to selection, with growing awareness of the range of FinOps tools and professional services available to support the FinOps practice across all FinOps Scopes and technology categories
  • A basic build/buy/automate analysis is completed for significant investment decisions, with initial consideration given to the relative merits of native technology provider tooling, third-party commercial solutions, and internally developed automation
  • A basic ROI methodology is in place to evaluate the expected benefits of meeting requirements gathered, enabling more informed and justified investment decisions for automation solutions, FinOps tools, and professional services
  • Implementation planning is more structured and consistent, with initial consideration given to how automation solutions and tools will be integrated into existing FinOps processes, workflows, and organizational structures
  • A baseline level of training and enablement is provided to FinOps Personas who will use selected tools and automation solutions, with training incorporated as a standard component of onboarding for new stakeholder Personas
  • Post-implementation evaluation of automation solutions, FinOps tools, and professional services activities is performed on a periodic basis, with outcomes used to inform future selection decisions and identify areas where solutions are becoming misaligned with evolving organizational needs
  • A script or check exists and runs on a schedule, such as nightly, but is not yet integrated into the CI/CD pipeline or pull request flow

Run

  • A comprehensive and continuously refined requirements gathering process is in place across all stakeholder Personas, capturing detailed needs and priorities for automation solutions, FinOps tools, and professional services activities in a way that is fully aligned with organizational strategy, FinOps Framework Capabilities, and evolving FinOps Scopes
  • Comprehensive market research is performed prior to selection, with deep awareness of the full range of FinOps tools and professional services available to support the FinOps practice, including emerging options
  • A detailed build/buy/automate analysis is completed for all significant investment decisions, with thorough consideration of the relative merits of native technology provider tooling, third-party commercial solutions, and internally developed automation, supported by clear and well-documented rationale
  • A mature ROI methodology is in place to evaluate the expected benefits of meeting requirements gathered within defined timeframes, with actual outcomes tracked and compared against initial projections to continuously improve investment decision making
  • Detailed implementation planning is standard practice, with automation solutions and FinOps tools fully integrated into existing FinOps processes, workflows, and organizational structures, and implementation outcomes measured and reported to relevant stakeholder Personas and Leadership
  • Comprehensive training and enablement programs are in place for all relevant FinOps Personas, with onboarding training provided as standard for new practitioners and ongoing refresher programs ensuring that knowledge remains current
  • Post-implementation evaluation of automation solutions, FinOps tools, and professional services activities is continuous and systematic, with regular comparison against emerging market alternatives, and evolving organizational requirements, ensuring that the organization’s automation and tooling investments remain aligned with its evolving FinOps practice

Functional Activities

FinOps Practitioner

As someone in the FinOps team role, I will…

  • Ensure that all relevant stakeholder Personas are involved in requirements gathering for automation solutions, FinOps tools, and professional services activities, capturing their specific needs and priorities to ensure that whatever is implemented is fit for purpose across all FinOps Scopes and technology categories
  • Work closely with all Personas from implementation and integration through to training, ongoing operation, and continuous evaluation, ensuring that investments deliver lasting value to the organization
  • Develop and maintain build/buy/automate criteria that guides investment decisions across automation solutions, FinOps tools, and professional services activities, ensuring that decisions are well-informed, consistently applied, and aligned with organizational strategy
  • Establish and maintain an ROI methodology for evaluating the expected and actual value of automation solutions, FinOps tools, and professional services investments, tracking outcomes against projections and using insights to continuously improve selection and investment decision making
  • Conduct regular post-implementation evaluations of automation solutions, FinOps tools, and professional services activities, benchmarking them against evolving organizational requirements and emerging market alternatives to ensure continued alignment with the organization’s FinOps practice
  • Record overrides, exceptions, and service impacts
  • Stay informed of emerging solutions, including developments in the FinOps Foundation community and the FinOps Landscape, and proactively assess their potential to advance the organization’s FinOps practice

Engineering

As someone in an Engineering role, I will…

  • Support the requirements gathering process by providing engineering, security, and compliance expertise, ensuring that automation solutions and FinOps tools are evaluated against technical requirements and organizational policies
  • Estimate cost impacts from code and configuration changes
  • Contribute automation and integration expertise to the design, development, and operationalization of automation solutions and FinOps tools, ensuring they are scalable, secure, interoperable, and aligned with open standards and existing engineering practices
  • Provide accurate and timely performance, utilization, and usage data where required to support the evaluation, selection, and ongoing assessment of automation solutions and FinOps tools across all FinOps Scopes and technology categories
  • Partner with FinOps Practitioners to design and implement automation solutions that reduce manual effort, improve consistency, and enable the FinOps practice to scale across all relevant FinOps Scopes and technology categories
  • Evaluate the technical feasibility and integration complexity of automation solutions and FinOps tools under consideration, providing clear and well-documented recommendations that inform build/buy/automate decisions
  • Stay informed of emerging automation technologies, open source tooling, and native technology provider capabilities, and advocate for their adoption where they would improve efficiency, scalability, or sustainability outcomes

Finance

As someone in a Finance role, I will…

  • Support the requirements gathering process by providing financial context, constraints, and priorities, ensuring that automation solutions, FinOps tools, and professional services offerings are evaluated against budgetary parameters and organizational financial policies
  • Support the development and management of budgets and forecasts for FinOps tools, and professional services investments, ensuring that planned expenditures are aligned with organizational financial strategy and that actual spend is tracked and reported against approved budgets
  • Support ongoing evaluation of automation solutions, FinOps tools, and professional services activities from a financial perspective, ensuring that investments continue to deliver expected ROI and that underperforming solutions are identified and addressed in a timely manner
  • Provide financial modeling and analysis to support build/buy/automate decisions, quantifying the fully burdened cost of ownership for each option and enabling well-informed investment decisions that balance upfront costs, ongoing operational expenses, and expected business value
  • Partner with FinOps Practitioners to develop and maintain the ROI methodology used to evaluate automation solutions, FinOps tools, and professional services investments, ensuring that financial metrics and value realization timelines are clearly defined and consistently applied
  • Incorporate investment outcomes from solutions and services into organizational budgeting and forecasting processes, ensuring that lessons learned from previous investments inform future financial planning and decision making

Procurement

As someone in a Procurement role, I will…

  • Lead and manage the requirements gathering process for FinOps tools and professional service providers ensuring that inputs from all relevant stakeholder Personas are captured and reflected in vendor selection criteria and commercial discussions
  • Leverage ongoing evaluation data and post-implementation performance insights to inform and strengthen commercial discussions, contract renewals, and vendor negotiations
  • Develop and maintain a vendor management process for FinOps tools, and professional services providers, establishing clear performance expectations, contractual obligations, and accountability mechanisms that protect the organization’s interests
  • Ensure that contractual agreements for FinOps tools, and professional services activities include appropriate provisions for data access, interoperability, open standards compliance, and exit strategies, reducing the risk of vendor lock-in and ensuring long-term flexibility
  • Partner with Finance and FinOps Practitioner Personas to evaluate the fully burdened cost for FinOps tools, and professional services engagement, ensuring that commercial decisions are grounded in a clear and comprehensive understanding of costs and expected returns
  • Work with FinOps Practitioner and Engineering Personas to stay informed of emerging FinOps tools in the market, proactively identifying opportunities to consolidate, replace, or supplement existing investments

Product

As someone in a Product role, I will…

  • Support the requirements gathering process by providing product-level context, priorities, and constraints, ensuring that automation solutions, FinOps tools, and professional services activities are evaluated against the needs of the products and services I am responsible for
  • Contribute to the ongoing evaluation of automation solutions, FinOps tools, and professional services activities from a product perspective, providing feedback on whether selected solutions are meeting the needs of product teams and surfacing opportunities for improvement or replacement where appropriate
  • Define and communicate the product-level outcomes and KPIs that automation solutions and FinOps tools should support, ensuring that selected solutions are capable of delivering the visibility, insights, and optimization capabilities needed to effectively manage the products and services I am responsible for
  • Partner with Engineering and FinOps Practitioner Personas to identify and prioritize automation opportunities within my area of product responsibility, ensuring that repeatable and manual FinOps activities are candidates for automation where they would improve efficiency and consistency
  • Incorporate feedback from Engineering, Finance, and other FinOps Personas into product-level requirements for automation solutions and FinOps tools, ensuring that the solutions selected reflect the full range of stakeholder needs and deliver value

Leadership

As someone in a Leadership role, I will…

  • Provide executive sponsorship and visibility for the adoption and operationalization of automation solutions, FinOps tools, and professional services activities, ensuring that all stakeholder Personas are engaged and accountable for their effective use
  • Ensure that the organization’s Automation, Tools & Services strategy is clearly aligned with organizational objectives, and the broader technology and business strategy across all technology categories
  • Collaborate with stakeholder Personas to establish clear success criteria, KPIs, and ROI expectations for automation solutions, FinOps tools, and professional services investments, and hold the organization accountable for tracking and reporting outcomes against those measures over time
  • Set organizational priorities for solutions and professional services activities, ensuring that resources are allocated in a way that maximizes the advancement of the organization’s FinOps practice
  • Foster a culture of continuous improvement across the organization, recognizing and rewarding teams that leverage automation solutions and FinOps tools effectively to drive efficiency, scalability, and business value

Measures of Success & KPIs

A primary measure of success for this Capability is the degree to which automation solutions, FinOps tools, and professional services activities are meeting business case expectations and delivering demonstrable ROI against the investments made. Organizations should establish clear and quantifiable success criteria at the outset of any investment decision, enabling objective evaluation of outcomes against initial projections over time.

Organizations will gain the highest benefit from their automation solutions, FinOps tools, and professional services investments when they have a structured process in place to perform periodic gap analysis against current and evolving organizational requirements, and when they conduct regular performance and value reviews of all solutions and professional services engagements to ensure continued alignment with the organization’s FinOps practice needs and expected outcomes.

Additional measures of success include the availability and adoption of high quality FinOps Education & Enablement programs tailored to the organization’s business processes and operational environment, fostering consistent and frequent use of automation solutions and FinOps tools by all stakeholder Personas. Successful organizations allocate dedicated budgets for training and enablement, recognizing that the value of tooling investments is directly dependent on the capability and confidence of the Personas using them.

A foundational measure of success is the breadth and depth of engagement with FinOps tools across all FinOps Personas, tracking not only how many Personas are actively using available solutions, but also how effectively those solutions are supporting their specific responsibilities and contributing to the advancement of the organization’s FinOps maturity level.

Metrics used in the development of KPIs should be represented in the context of business priorities and technology strategy, and reflect the value and effectiveness of automation solutions, FinOps tools, and professional services activities. These KPIs could include:

  • Total cost savings or cost avoidance generated by automation solutions and FinOps tools over a defined period, measured against the total cost of investment to demonstrate a clear and positive ROI
  • Idle cost avoided and assets reclaimed
  • Spend prevented or redirected
  • The proportion of stakeholder Personas actively adopting and regularly using FinOps tools within their area of responsibility, with adoption rates trending upward over time
  • The quality of the experience for FinOps Personas using automation solutions, FinOps tools, or interacting with consultants, as measured by a Net Promoter Score, user satisfaction survey, or similar mechanism, with scores trending positively over time
  • Post-implementation assessment outcomes that evaluate whether automation solutions, FinOps tools, and professional services activities are meeting the requirements and success criteria defined by all stakeholder Personas at the outset of the investment decision
  • The proportion of repeatable and manual FinOps activities that have been successfully automated, with automation coverage expanding over time across all relevant FinOps Scopes and technology categories
  • The time to value realized from new automation solutions implemented and FinOps tool deployments, with onboarding and integration timelines trending downward as the organization’s maturity level advances

Inputs & Outputs

Inputs to this Capability

  • Organizational policy, risk, and governance documents that define the boundaries and criteria within which automation solutions, FinOps tools, and professional services activities can be evaluated, selected, and operationalized
  • Security and compliance policies that establish the technical and regulatory requirements that automation solutions and FinOps tools must satisfy prior to procurement and implementation, including data access, privacy, and interoperability considerations
  • Organizational procurement processes and vendor management criteria that govern how FinOps tools and professional services providers are evaluated, contracted, and managed over time
  • Requirements and functionality gaps identified through the other FinOps Framework Capabilities, which inform the selection and prioritization of FinOps tools and professional services activities needed to advance the organization’s FinOps practice
  • Through the Reporting & Analytics Capability, performance, utilization, and adoption data that informs the ongoing evaluation of automation solutions and FinOps tools, and supports post-implementation assessment against defined success criteria and KPIs
  • Through the Data Ingestion Capability, ensure that the cost, usage, and sustainability data that automation solutions and FinOps tools depend on to function effectively is collected, normalized, and made available from all relevant technology providers, data providers, and billing sources
  • Financial budgets, investment approvals, and ROI expectations from Finance and Leadership Personas that define the commercial parameters within which FinOps tools and professional services investments are evaluated and approved

Outputs from this Capability

  • Through the FinOps Education & Enablement Capability, training and enablement programs that ensure all FinOps Personas are equipped to effectively leverage selected FinOps tools within their area of responsibility
  • Outputs to the FinOps Practice Operations Capability reflecting the automation solutions, FinOps tools, and professional services activities in use across the organization, enabling consistent governance, oversight, and continuous improvement of the overall FinOps practice
  • ROI and post-implementation evaluation outcomes that are communicated to Finance and Leadership Personas, providing evidence of the value generated by automation solutions, FinOps tools, and professional services investments and informing future investment decision making
  • Operationalized automation solutions and FinOps tools that are actively used by all relevant Personas across all FinOps Scopes, enabling the effective execution of FinOps Framework Capabilities throughout the organization
  • A documented and continuously refined Automation, Tools & Services strategy that serves as a reference for all relevant Personas and guides future investment decisions, vendor management activities, and automation development priorities

FinOps Vendor Landscape

View the FinOps Landscape to learn more about these vendors.

Related Assets
FinOps Tools and Services How FinOps Tools and Practices Can Help Control Licensing and Other Costs (Expedia Group) FinOps for Azure Managed Disks: Optimizing for Value Build vs Buy: Why UKG Chose to Build its own Cloud Cost Management Solution How to Create a High-Visibility FinOps Dashboard at SAP Introduction to FOCUS (FinOps Cost and Usage Specification) FinOpsPod 19: A Certified Professional's Look at Tooling and Teams

Make Suggestions

Suggest a Resource